Delivering Offshore Wind Power In Europe
Delivering Offshore Wind
Power in Europe
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LARGE-SCALE DEPLOYMENT
OF OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE BY 2020
By the European Wind Energy Association
EWEA w
E
EW
as mandated by its Board of Directors to set up a working group on offshore wind
shore w
pow
p
po er
w . This report is the result of the group’s work, undertaken in the second half of 2007
alf of 20
and chaired b
a
and
y Gordon Edge, British Wind Energy Association (BWEA).
The Offshore Wind Industr
T
The
y Group (OWIG) members are:
Gordon Edge
G
Gor
, BWEA, Chair
Loïc Blanchard
L
Loï
, EWEA
Car
C
Carlos Gascó Travesedo, Iberdrola energias renovables
Claudia Grotz
C
Cla
, German Wind Power Association / Bundesverband WindEnergie
Mar
M
Ma tin Huss, A2Sea
Jak
J
Ja ob Lau Holst
k
, Danish Wind Industry Association / Vindmølleindustrien
Raul Manzanas Ochaga
R
Rau
via, Acciona Energia
Bo Mør
B
Bo
up, Vestas Offshore A/S
Matthias Rapp
M
Ma
, Swedish Wind Energy Association / Svensk Vindkraft
Jan van der T
J
Jan
empel, Delft University of Technology – Offshore engineering
Chris V
C
Chr
eal, Airtricity
Cover photo:
Platform for offshore wind turbine at Horns Rev, Denmark
(© Vestas Central Europe)
Delivering Offshore Wind
Power in Europe
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LARGE-SCALE DEPLOYMENT
OF OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE BY 2020
By the European Wind Energy Association
Foreword
Energy policy in Europe is entering increasingly
intended to map out the potential development up
stormy waters. The imperatives of combating climate
to 2020, alongside an analysis of the issues and
change and securing energy supply are becoming
barriers surrounding the sector, and which must
ever stronger, while globalisation demands cost
be addressed if the potential for offshore wind is
competitiveness. The sea, however, can provide a
to be tapped fully. We intend this document to be
key element of the strategy – offshore wind. As a
the fi rst step towards the kind of policy framework
continent with a proud maritime history, blessed
that European countries implemented for offshore
with a huge resource and the pioneer in onshore
oil and gas. Policy makers at all levels of the EU
wind power, Europe is well placed to lead the world
must engage with this agenda in partnership with
in this technology, so vital for our global future. Now
the wind industry if the sector’s benefi ts are to be
is the time for the EU to act in a coordinated manner
captured for European citizens.
in order to develop this technology to its full potential
and consequently export it around the globe. Only
Let us be clear: offshore wind energy is at heart
then can it can contribute fully to the urgent battle
a European matter. Whether you have a coastline
against climate change.
is not important. We are talking about exploiting
one of the major domestic energy resources of the
Offshore wind technology is progressing fast, but
EU which to date has been largely untapped. The
it needs to be driven faster by a policy framework
diverse companies that make up the offshore wind
as positive as that which promoted the offshore
sector recognise the challenges that confront us
oil and gas sector from the 1960s onwards. Thirty
to make our vision a reality, but at the same time
years ago, North Sea oil came to the rescue of a
stand ready to invest the time and money required
Europe facing an international oil crisis. We are now
to forge a pan-European industry. We look forward to
faced with a different crisis, and we need offshore
charting a course with our partners that can lead us
wind to help solve it. This report is the work of an
to calmer energy policy waters.
EWEA Working Group on Offshore Wind Power; it is
Gordon Edge
Loïc Blanchard
Chairman – EWEA Offshore
Senior Policy Advisor – EWEA
Wind Industry Group
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
Table of Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Europe’s energy challenge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Offshore wind power benefi ts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Offshore wind market 2007-2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10
Market status in 2007
Market outlook by 2010
Market forecast by 2015
Market scenario by 2020
Challenges and recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
Policy
Market
Research and technological development
Grid integration
Environment and planning
Policy recommendations summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24
Arklow Bank wind farm, Ireland (© Airtricity)
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
1
Introduction
Offshore wind is an emerging industry and a new
rope by 2015 and 2020, and suggests a series
user of the sea with distinct industrial and political
of policy recommendations to maximise offshore
development requirements compared to onshore
wind power by 2020.
wind power. If the vast potential of Europe’s offshore
wind energy resource is to be exploited, the EU insti-
The report estimates that between 20 GW and
tutions, EU Member States and regions must work
40 GW of offshore wind energy capacity will be
together. They must develop regulatory framework
operating in the European Union by 2020. A fully
conditions that encourage industry, sub-suppliers,
developed European offshore wind resource could
researchers, developers, grid companies and plan-
deliver a capacity of several hundred GW to supply
ning authorities to take an active part in developing
our future energy demands. Developing less than
and deploying offshore wind technology.
5% of the North Sea surface area would enable
offshore wind to supply roughly one-quarter of the
Offshore wind power technology builds on onshore
EU’s current electricity needs2. In the period up to
wind technology, and its future development will
2020, however, the amount of this potential that
require participation from other sectors such as
can be developed is limited by a number of fac-
offshore oil and gas engineering and technology,
tors; the extent to which the barriers are resolved
the logistical skills of offshore service providers,
will determine the capacity that will result. Offshore
transmission system operators and the infrastruc-
wind power could meet more than 4% of EU power
ture technology of the power industry.
consumption in 2020 (depending on the effect of
energy effi ciency measures3), or approximately 50%
Although long-term prospects for offshore wind pow-
of EU power production from large hydro power sta-
er are promising, the technology faces a number of
tions today.
challenges in terms of technological performance,
lack of skilled personnel, shortage of appropriate
Industrial commitment and ambition, research and
auxiliary services (e.g. crane vessels), impact on
development efforts, political action at Member
the local environment, competition for space with
State and EU level and development of adequate
other marine users, compatibility with the Europe-
grid infrastructure are all factors that will deter-
an grid infrastructure and secure integration into
mine the level of offshore wind energy installations
the energy system.
by 2020.
This report comes from the EWEA Working Group
The rather wide range between the high (40 GW)
on Offshore Wind Power1. It establishes scenarios
and low (20 GW) scenarios refl ects the uncertain-
for the development of offshore wind energy in Eu-
ty over several factors that will infl uence delivery.
1 For information on the Offshore Wind Advisory Group please see the inside front cover.
2 Going for 25% of EU-25 2004 consumption requires 180 GW over a developed area totalling some 17,900 km2, which is approx. 3% of the total 575,000
km2 surface area of the North Sea.
3 Assuming power demand according to the European Commission’s 2020 baseline scenario, 40 GW of offshore wind power would meet 3.4% of demand.
2
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
Middelgrunden wind
farm, Denmark
(© Siemens AG)
create the necessary
onshore and offshore
infrastructure should
be considered for the
purpose of increasing
renewables, reduc-
ing carbon emissions
and improving the
functioning of the In-
ternal Energy Market
through larger inter-
connectors.
On the industry side,
However, what is certain is that if we are to maxim-
the challenge is to create a sustainable offshore
ise the delivery of offshore wind capacity by 2020,
wind industry. While the onshore wind industry is
industry and governments must join forces. It is
starting to be integrated at European level, off-
also clear that the political and industrial decisions
shore wind is still primarily based around a limited
taken over the coming fi ve years will determine off-
number of European Member State markets. No
shore wind power’s contribution to the EU’s 2020
series production in offshore wind manufacturing
target of 20% renewable energy.
and installation has yet been established, and the
sector is still developing and utilising large special-
The role of national authorities and the EU is to
ised components rather than the standard com-
provide a stable, predictable market framework
ponents needed for reducing cost. The different
which gives the industry the confi dence to innovate
challenges of offshore wind require the industry to
and invest in the required manufacturing capacity.
move more swiftly to establish links across borders
For this to happen, a European framework for off-
and develop a European industry for a European
shore wind power targeted at removing barriers,
market. The creation of such partnerships, neces-
reducing investment risks, planning interconnec-
sary in order to deliver complex offshore projects,
tors and grid infrastructure, guiding both the public
will inspire greater confi dence in industry players
and private sectors and strongly coordinating Mem-
to develop the techniques and technologies that
ber States’ policies is urgently needed. In addition,
will enable the sector to expand rapidly, as onshore
there is a need to boost research and develop-
wind power has done.
ment signifi cantly. A Joint Technology Initiative4 to
4 In accordance with Article 171 of the Treaty Establishing the European Community, 'The Community may set up joint undertakings or any other structure
necessary for the effi cient execution of Community research, technological development and demonstration programmes'.
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
3
Europe’s
energy challenge
Energy is essential for Europe to function. The days
pean Commission forecasts that imports will reach
of cheap energy for Europe seem to be over. The
70% by 2030. If energy trends and policies remain
challenges of climate change, increasing import
as they are, the EU’s reliance on gas imports will
dependence and higher energy prices are faced by
jump to 84% of gas consumption and 93% of oil
all EU members. Moreover, the interdependence of
by 20305.
EU Member States for energy, as for many other
areas, is increasing – a power failure in one country
Europe is already paying the price of energy depend-
has immediate effects in others.
ence. According to the European Commission, the
EU’s gas import bill alone increases by €15 billion
It is clear that a radical change is required in the
annually for every $20 increase in price of a barrel
way energy is produced and consumed. This means
of oil. Hence, the past few years’ increase in oil
transforming Europe into a highly effi cient, sustain-
prices from $20 to $80 (November 2007) has add-
able energy economy.
ed €45 billion to the EU’s annual gas import bill.
Security of supply
In addition, several EU Member States are essen-
tially dependent on a single gas supplier, and once
Europe’s dependence on imported energy has ris-
en from 20% at the signing of the Treaty of Rome
5 'Energy for a changing world – An energy policy for Europe' – European
in 1957 to its present level of 50%, and the Euro-
Commission 2007
http://ec.europa.eu/energy/energy_policy/doc/2007_03_02_energy_
leafl et_en.pdf
Horns Rev wind farm, Denmark (© DONG Energy A/S)
4
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
Beatrice project,
Scotland (© REpower)
the lack of a crisis support structure between coun-
tries is factored in, the EU’s growing vulnerability
becomes evident.
Electricity infrastructure
There is an urgent need to increase capacity and
make new investments in transmission and dis-
tribution grids. Electricity demand continues to
increase by around 1.5% each year, but existing in-
frastructure and many electricity plants are reach-
ing the end of their useful life. Over the next 25
Global and internal energy markets
years, around €900 billion will need to be invested
in new power generating capacity and more than
Conventional primary energies, such as coal, oil,
€560 billion of investments must be made in new
gas and nuclear, have fi nite life expectancies. Si-
transmission and distribution grids in the EU6. If we
multaneously, global energy demand is growing.
are to meet our climate targets it is essential that
Developing countries, China and India in particular,
the large expansion in capacity be seen as an op-
are entering the energy-intensive phase of their de-
portunity to turn the entire European electricity mix
velopment where people buy their fi rst computer
towards renewable energy sources.
or car. Europe has to compete globally against the
US, China and India for the use of these increas-
Climate change
ingly scarce resources.
Global warming is no longer a contested phenom-
Naturally, Europe should continue to engage in
enon, and climate change is considered the great-
the global competition for the remaining energy
est challenge Europe and the world will face during
resources. However, if Europe is to reduce its ex-
the 21st century. The energy sector is the largest
posure to foreign control of fuels, it must follow
source of greenhouse gas emissions. The EU has
a strategy of developing, deploying and exporting
made a commitment to reduce its greenhouse gas
renewable energy technologies while increasing en-
emissions by 30% in 2020 if other nations follow
ergy effi ciency.
its lead. That requires signifi cant efforts to change
the current energy supply mix and more effective
To respond to these challenges, the European Un-
climate policies at the EU level.
ion has begun drawing up a common energy policy,
which is built around the central aims of combating
climate change, limiting dependency on imports,
6 'World Energy Outlook 2006' – International Energy Agency (IEA).
promoting jobs and growth in Europe, and providing
secure and affordable energy to all consumers.
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
5
Offshore Wind Map: operational
and planned farms in Europe
•Puerto del Bilbao
•Libron
•Port la Nouvelle
•Termoli
•Delta del’Ebro
•Banco de Trafalgar
•Mar de Trafalgar Park
•Cabo de Trafalgar
Ragusa•
6
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND PO
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND P WER IN EUR
OWER IN EU OPE
ROPE
Beatrice
Frederikshaven
Bockstigen
Utgrunden
Solway Firth/
Blyth
Yttre Stengrund
Tunø Knob
Robin Rigg A&B•
Middelgrunden
Horns Rev
Samsø•Lillgrund
Arklow
Barrow
Vindeby
Rhyl Flats• Burbo Bank
Alpha Ventus•
Nysted
North Hoyle
Lynne•
• Inner Dowsing
Scroby Sands
NSW
•Q7
Kentish Flats
•Thornton Bank
• Côte d’Albatre
Operational offshore wind farms
• Offshore wind projects to be built in 2008-2009
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND PO
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND P WER IN EUR
OWER IN EU OPE
ROPE
7
Offshore wind power benefi ts
As a strategic, domestic and largely untapped
Internal energy market functioning
resource, offshore wind is one of the key
technologies for achieving the energy and climate
Despite its documented advantages, the EU has not
goals of the EU. In particular, it will be one of
so far succeeded in establishing a functioning and
the key components in helping the EU deliver its
competitive internal electricity market that works.
recently agreed target of 20% of its total energy
One of the concerns is the limited power exchange
consumption being provided by renewable sources
possibility between Member States due to lack of
by 20207. Because of its scale and extra-territorial
physical interconnection capacity and ineffi cient
nature, offshore wind should be considered a
capacity allocation mechanisms. By its size and its
project of European interest.
extra-territorial nature, offshore wind power should
create a demand for increased interconnection
Security of supply
capacity and become a catalyst for improving the
possibilities of power exchange.
Offshore wind power could signifi cantly reduce
fossil fuel imports. An estimated capacity of 40 GW
Offshore wind power will contribute to a more se-
would produce 140 TWh8, representing 13 MToe
cure supply of electricity beyond Member States with
(tones of oil equivalent) of fossil fuels.
coastlines, and is a catalyst for the realisation of the
internal electricity market in Europe.
Offshore wind will play a crucial role in securing indig-
enous energy supply in the future and reducing our
Climate change
energy import dependence.
Sustainability is at the heart of European Union
policies, and the energy sector is expected to
play an important role in meeting the EU’s Kyoto
commitment. Wind energy is a cost-effective means
of achieving future carbon reductions. The Kyoto
target reduction in terms of CO represents 355.8
2
Mt. Forty GW of offshore wind energy would save 105
Mt (around 30% of the target). Taking the price of
CO as 25 € /tonne9, the additional total CO benefi t
2
2
can be calculated at approximately 3 € billion.
Offshore wind can help the EU meet its commitment
to CO reduction.
2
Burbo Bank wind farm, UK (© Siemens AG)
7 http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/trans/92802.pdf
8 140 TWh are based on average estimated capacity factor of 40%
9 Actual market prices (for 2006 EU Allowances) have fl uctuated between 7 and 30 €/t in the period January-July 2006, with averages fl uctuating roughly
between 15 and 20 €/t.
8
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
Lillgrund wind farm, Sweden
(© Hans Blomberg, Vattenfall)
Lisbon Strategy, knowledge-based
economy and technological leadership
Offshore wind is at the cutting edge of technology.
Europe has a globally strong position in the market
sector: worldwide, the European wind turbine
manufacturing industry has a market share of 80%,
and for offshore this rises to 100%. Deploying offshore
wind energy would increase the competitiveness of
Europe by paving the way to a strong export position
Maritime activities development
in a market with enormous global potential. The
necessary technological development will also
Europe is rich in marine resources which have a
feed through to onshore wind, ensuring continued
direct effect on the lives of the citizens: half of
European leadership in the fi eld.
the continent’s population lives less than 50 km
away from the coastline and 40% of EU GDP is
Offshore wind has the potential to strengthen Europe’s
generated in maritime areas10. In many Member
export position both with onshore and offshore
States, the recent growth of the maritime economy
technologies.
has been higher than that of the overall economy,
in particular in regions active in maritime logistics.
Regional development, creation of jobs
The potential for European industries to develop
The potential for wind energy to boost economies
cutting-edge maritime products that can lead in world
and create jobs is well documented for onshore
markets, through the innovation ‘push’ of offshore wind
applications. For offshore wind, due to the limited
technologies, is also large given Europe’s considerable
number of projects, the impacts are not yet felt.
expertise in marine technology.
However, offshore wind has already started to create
jobs in areas which, due to declining shipyards,
The offshore wind sector is in the rare position of
decreasing fi shery activity or the slowing down of
being able to provide all of these benefi ts
other industries, have high unemployment rates.
A strong wind energy sector does not only mean
The deployment of offshore wind energy gives a strong
reduced CO emissions, but it is also synonymous
2
impulse to job creation and regional development.
with sustainable economic growth, reduced energy
import dependence, and an overall increase in
export opportunities, regional development, high
quality jobs and European industrial leadership.
10 'An Integrated Maritime Policy for the European Union' – European Commission, October 2007
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
9
Offshore wind market
2007 – 2020
The development of offshore wind power holds
Back in 2003, EWEA published a scenario for wind
many uncertainties. Different fi gures ranging from
energy, including a 2020 target for offshore wind
20 to 80 GW by 2020 are being circulated and de-
energy of 70 GW. Recent industrial and policy de-
bated in different policy arenas. EWEA decided in
velopments11 at EU level require a revision of the
2007 to bring the industry together to get a clearer
target. For various reasons, including a booming
view and a larger degree of consensus about the
global onshore market, that target will be reached
likely path that offshore wind energy will take in the
at a later stage. The EU market for onshore wind
future. An EWEA Offshore Wind Industry Advisory
power grew by an average annual rate of 33.4%
Group was tasked by the EWEA Board with bringing
over a 14-year period (1992-2006). If the offshore
forward delivery scenarios for 2020.
wind market in the EU grows by the same rate over
the next 14 years, 50 GW of offshore wind power
will be operating in Europe by 2020.
To respond to the new policy agenda, the industry
will have to determine the potential contribution of
offshore wind power to the agreed target of 20%
by 2020 as Member States are preparing national
actions plans for renewable energy.
This analysis aims to provide long-term scenarios
to 2020 based on a sound understanding of the
market trend in the offshore sector in Europe.
Data is based on various sources of market es-
timates12 and analysis collected during summer
2007. Information was cross-checked with indus-
try estimates.
Due to the long lead times of offshore wind
projects, their limited number and the increasing
uncertainty of project completion over time, this
document relies on a phased approach: an outlook
for 2010, a forecast for 2015 and scenarios for
2020. Results and fi ndings are presented in the
following section.
Horns Rev wind farm, Denmark (© DONG Energy A/S)
11 Council meeting – 8/9 March 2007 (20% by 2020 binding target for Renewable Energy)
12 BTM Consult (2007), Emerging Energy Research (2007), Make consulting (2007), Douglas Westwood (2007), Wind power monthly.
10
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
FIGURE 1: Offshore wind market development in Europe (1991-2007)
1000 MW
Cumulative installation
Annual installation
500 MW
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Market status in 2007
concentrated in Denmark and the United Kingdom.
For 2009 onwards a low and high estimate had
By 2007, the industry had developed 25 projects,
to be developed, so as to refl ect the increasing
many of them large-scale and fully commercial,
uncertainty over project delivery in this timescale.
with a total capacity of around 1,100 MW in fi ve
However, given the current limited distribution
countries. In terms of electricity production, at the
of offshore wind power in Europe, the historical
end of 2006, offshore wind farm installations rep-
growth rates, the wind potential of each country,
resented 1.8% of the total installed wind power
the projects in the planning phase, the industry
capacity13, but generated 3.3% of electricity from
assessments and the policies and targets of each
wind energy. Denmark, the United Kingdom, the
Member State, a total cumulative installed capacity
Netherlands, Sweden and Ireland had operating
of 3-4 GW by the end of 2010 can be expected,
offshore wind farms.
with a medium estimate of around 3.5 GW14.
Market outlook by 2010
Market forecast by 2015
For the period 2007 to 2009, fi gures from the
In the medium term up to 2015, based on a number
main market analysts do not diverge, given the
of market estimates and on projects currently being
limited number of planned projects and their long
planned, 10-15 GW of installed capacity in Europe
lead times. In 2008 and 2009, the offshore wind
can be forecast. In this period, development will
market will see projects being delivered in the UK
be mainly driven by the United Kingdom, followed
(800 MW), Denmark (200 MW), Sweden (140 MW),
by Germany. The widening range of estimates is
the Netherlands (120 MW), France (105 MW),
justifi ed by the further increase in uncertainty over
Germany (60 MW) and Belgium (30 MW). By the
project completion. Therefore, three forecasts have
end of 2008, around 80% of the market will be
been established: low, medium and high, with cu-
13 By the end of 2006 the total cumulative installed wind capacity reached 48 GW. In an average wind year 48 GW of wind produces approximately 100 TWh
of electricity, equal to 3.3% of total EU electricity consumption. (See EWEA press release 1st February 2007 – http://www.ewea.org/fi leadmin/
ewea_documents/documents/press_releases/2007/070201_Statistics_2006_Press_Release.pdf)
14 These fi gures are consistent with the EWEA 80 GW forecast including 4 GW offshore by 2010.
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
11
Offshore research platform
FINO 1, Germany
(© BMU/transit/Härtrich)
mulative installed capacities by 2015 of 10 GW,
12 GW and 15 GW respectively.
Drivers of offshore wind vary from country to country.
In some European markets, the move to offshore is
driven by high resources, a desire to expand wind
power capacity beyond the potential of onshore de-
velopment, or by government pressure. Recently,
there have been encouraging signs for future mar-
ket growth, with a grid connection agreement and
upgraded payment mechanism in Germany, three
“Round 2”15 approvals in the UK, a successful ten-
der process for two large Danish wind farms, the
• Short term supply chain bottlenecks (skilled staff
adoption of a regulatory framework for Spain, and
and specifi c vessels mainly) are progressively
the fi rst wind farm contracts in France and Belgium.
addressed through increased standardisation of
practices and sector-specifi c high-level training
However, the deliverability of the projects remains
capacities
strongly conditioned by wind turbine availability.
• France, Belgium and the Netherlands see projects
Projects relying on 3–3.6 MW machines will not be
developed and completed (2008-2011)
able to get their wind turbines before 2009-2010,
• Spain is expected to begin its offshore de-
and the ones planning to use 5 MW wind turbines
velopment at the end of the forecast period
will have to await the serial production of today’s
(2012-2015) with one or two projects under de-
prototypes and the results from the test facility in
velopment
Germany.
Market scenario by 2020
Other assumptions considered in this forecast are:
• The German Alpha Ventus test site is fully com-
As new actions always take time to implement and
missioned in 2009 and delivers results for 5 MW
make their full impact on the market, decisions
machines by 2011
made today will shape the energy mix of tomorrow.
• In the UK, “Round 2” projects of 500 MW or
The 2020 horizon is particularly relevant in relation
greater are expected to go on-line from 2010. A
to the political decisions taken in 2007: the agree-
“Round 3” will be fully launched in 2008/2009
ment on binding targets of 20% renewable energy
with sites allocated from 2010 onwards
and 20% greenhouse gas reduction by 2020.
• Sweden sees the take-off of several large scale
projects due to a more favourable regulatory
The underlying assumption in these scenarios is
framework
that the strong development of wind power to date
15 Rounds "1" and "2" refer to the UK government’s process of allocating sites for wind development
12
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
FIGURE 2: Offshore wind development
(Annual and cumulative in MW) 2010-2015
2007
2008
2009
2010
2015
can continue in the coming years as
Low*
205
645
500
1,000
1,700
long as six complementary aspects are
Annual
Medium
2,350
implemented:
High
900
1,500
3,000
• The clear and strong commitment of
Low
1,083
1,848
2,228
3,228 10,000
the European Union and its Member
Cumulative Medium
12,000
States to wind power development
High 2,628
4,128 15,000
continues
* For 2009 onwards a low and high estimate had to be developed, so as to
• Strong and continued technological
refl ect the increasing uncertainty over project delivery in this timescale.
development and deployment to the
marketplace from the wind industry
FIGURE 3: Offshore wind development 2006-2020 (Cumulative, GW)
• Timely implementation of supply chain
capabilities from manufacturing to
40
40
project completion and maintenance
• Appropriate planning practices and
30
technological achievements are trans-
lated into the construction of large
20
20
scale commercial wind farms
15
• Grid infrastructures including inter-
10
10
connectors are designed, built and
3
4
appropriately fi nanced in time to ac-
0.9
0
commodate large-scale wind power
2006 2010 2015 2020
• Implementation of more effi
cient
power exchange mechanisms in the
electricity market between Member
States to ensure integration of re-
FIGURE 4: Annual installation 2015-2020
newable energy, including large-scale
Low
Medium
High
wind power.
Installation 2015-2020 (GW/year)
2
3.6
5
Therefore, two scenarios have been
established – low “minimal efforts” and
high “policy impetus” – resulting in two cumulative
50 GW of offshore wind will be reached in 2020.
installed capacities by 2020 of 20 GW and 40 GW
However, lead times for planning, lack of physical
respectively. If offshore wind energy grows at the
infrastructure, long project development times and
same rate over the next 14 years as onshore
short-term supply chain bottlenecks make this
wind energy has over the past 14 years in the EU,
unlikely by 2020.
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
13
Challenges
and recommendations
Early results from the fi rst offshore wind projects
efforts and an adequate market deployment strat-
have been promising. In 15 years, wind farms with
egy are key to achieving economic and fi nancial vi-
a total capacity of 1 GW have been erected in the
ability and thus to enabling a sustainable fl ow of
waters of several EU Member States. But it is clear
projects to be developed commercially, which in
that several barriers remain in the way of a fuller
turn will drive down costs further through a higher
development. If we are to develop offshore wind
volume of business and increased competition.
power at the level envisioned both by EWEA and
some EU Member States, barriers must be removed
in a timely fashion. Such barriers and risks include
Policy
siting and licensing issues, whether projects can
be fi nanced, lack of skilled personnel, shortage of
According to the European Commission, the 20%
appropriate auxiliary services (e.g. crane vessels),
binding target by 2020 implies 35% of electricity from
grid infrastructure and management needs, tech-
renewables compared to 15% in 2005. In its strategic
nology development requirement, logistical, supply
energy review, the European Commission estimated
chain gaps and environmental issues.
that wind could contribute 12% of EU electricity by
2020. One-third of this will come from offshore instal-
Challenges have been sorted into fi ve categories
lations. EWEA estimates that wind power both on-
of issues:
shore and offshore could contribute to 11-14% (180
• Policy
GW) of wind power in 2020 (depending on 2020 de-
• Market
mand) from a level of 3% (50 GW) at the end of 2006.
• Research and technological development
The target cannot be met without large-scale offshore
• Grid integration: grid connection, network
wind. Thirteen years is short notice. Strong policy
upgrade and power market design
measures must therefore be implemented rapidly.
• Environmental requirements and planning
practices
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Today, the costs of offshore wind energy production
Establishing a European policy framework for
are higher than those of onshore: expectations are
offshore wind power
that several factors working together will make the
development of offshore wind energy sources more
To guarantee investor confi dence, and develop off-
cost-effective, so that in the long term, costs will
shore wind farms on a suffi cient scale, this sec-
fall as more projects come on line, as has hap-
tor needs a stable political framework. Legislation
pened on land. However, in the short term, as future
could be preceded by a European Commission
projects will be more complex to develop further
Offshore Action Plan. This Action Plan should be
out at sea (entailing longer cables) and in deeper
formulated before the Swedish EU presidency in
waters, costs are likely to increase. Targeted R&D
2009, and be ready to be adopted during it.
14
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
Blade factory in Nakskov,
Denmark (© Vestas)
The European framework
should be based on four pil-
lars: legislation and policy
measures (including spe-
cifi c payment mechanisms),
grid reinforcement meas-
ures, environmental meas-
ures and R&D measures. This framework should
In addition, there is a need for increased coopera-
encourage EU Member States to develop national
tion through working groups between public admin-
action plans containing sector targets and a quan-
istration and wind industry to identify potential bar-
tifi cation of the expected contribution of offshore
riers, limitations and suggest measures to remove
wind power. This framework should integrate con-
those barriers.
clusions on how to develop offshore wind power
effectively: work done by the Member States and
Increasing regional cooperation to maximise
contained in the Egmond Declaration (2004)16, the
the synergies and complementarities of various
Copenhagen Strategy (2005)17 and the more re-
regions with offshore wind ambition around the
cent Berlin Declaration (2007)18.
North Sea, the Baltic Sea, the Atlantic Ocean
and the Mediterranean
Such conclusions include:
• The “one-stop shop offi ce approach”
None of the regions is able to bring the whole off-
• The convenience of defi ning division of respon-
shore wind supply chain to its predicted level of
sibility among different layers of the public
development on its own. Together, the regions can
administration in Member States
deliver a European supply chain that is capable of
• The need for long-term and strategic grid
supporting projects in Europe and developments
planning
elsewhere in the world. Such a supply chain offers
• The importance of more effi cient consenting
a unique opportunity to use and enlarge the market
procedures which build on past experience and
potential of these regions. Regional fund opportu-
are in proportion to the scale of the project
nities for the development of transregional projects
• The need to ensure good quality assessments
should be explored.
• The establishment and use of marine spatial
planning instruments to reach optimal site
selection
16 Egmond Declaration, EU policy workshop Development of offshore Wind Energy (Egmond aan Zee, 30 September – 1 October 2004) –
http://www.senternovem.nl/mmfi les/_%20Declaration%20OWE%2008-10-2004%20FINAL_tcm24-124637.pdf
17 Copenhagen Strategy: European Policy Seminar on Offshore Wind Power Copenhagen, Copenhagen 27 October 2005 – http://www.ens.dk/graphics/
UK_Energy_Supply/Renewable_energy/Windpower/Copenhagen_Strategy.pdf
18 Berlin Declaration: European Policy workshop on Offshore Wind Power deployment, Berlin 23 February 2007 http://www.bmu.de/fi les/pdfs/allgemein/
application/pdf/eupolicy_declaration.pdf
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
15
Nysted wind farm, Denmark
(© Jan Kofod Winther, DONG Energy A/S)
will also have to take offshore wind into account,
and Member States will have to decide how they
wish to manage the interaction between this new
technology and their national security needs.
Market
Achieving 40 GW in 2020 means adding 39 GW –
i.e. building 7,800 turbines of 5 MW – over 13 years.
It represents the manufacture of 600 turbines per
year, or 50 turbines per month, plus foundations and
electrical infrastructure. Those turbines have to be
assembled, transported and installed on sites. The
Clarifying roles for regulation,
industrial sector has to address this challenge.
governmental and European policies
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Achieving a cost-competitive offshore wind indus-
try will require signifi cant advances in the areas of
Establishing stable, coordinated
technology and policy. Many of the challenges re-
long-term markets for offshore wind in Europe
quire an integrated approach. For example, public
acceptance of offshore wind facilities will depend
Member States and the Commission must work to-
on the existence of a credible planning and permit-
gether to ensure that the market for offshore wind
awarding process that ensures the recognition of
in Europe is stable, long-term and grows smoothly.
public benefi ts from the use of the resource. Clear,
The coordination of policies to support the sector
stable regulations and transparent, predictable
is necessary to allow investments to be made with
permit-awarding, underpinned by good knowledge
confi dence that markets will not be in excessive
of impacts and assessment of risks, will be es-
competition with each other. Ideally, the EU Mem-
sential.
ber States with offshore wind ambitions should col-
laborate to provide a strategic interconnected grid
Given the cross-border nature of offshore wind,
system, with contributions from EU funds. Member
its development will interact with European poli-
States must coordinate the regulatory and market
cies dealing with different aspects of the sea and
systems at each end of these grid links in order to
its use. In particular, offshore wind’s impact on
facilitate the sale of the resulting power into the
the Common Fisheries Policy must be dealt with,
appropriate market at the time of generation.
and the priority given to each sector clearly estab-
lished. Policies regarding shipping and navigation
16
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
Building and optimising the supply chain for
a timely and sustainable fl ow of commercial
projects
From initial site selection through to installation
and operation, today’s wind energy industry covers
a wide range of disciplines, expertise and industrial
sectors. Going offshore provides extra challenges
due to the size of the projects, and the construc-
tion and maintenance work at sea that requires
specialised equipment and expertise from sectors
ranging from foundation manufacturers to opera-
tors of vessels. All these players have to plan and
invest to meet the challenge of large-scale offshore
wind deployment. However, EWEA is confi dent that
the supply chain will undertake this activity so long
as there is a clear and credible pipeline of project
work for these companies to bid for.
Ensuring coordination and collaboration of the
Scroby Sands wind farm, UK (© Archant)
wind industry with the power infrastructure
industry, the maritime industry and the oil and
tors, health and safety bodies and environmental
gas industry in order to integrate offshore wind
authorities are among the key elements for the
power with established uses of the sea
success of future offshore wind. In addition, links
must be established with the existing sea user in-
While policies for other industrial uses of the sea
dustries, to minimise confl icts between them and
(e.g. offshore oil and gas development, gravel ex-
offshore wind and to emphasise the synergies and
traction) are well established, offshore wind en-
opportunities for these players that offshore wind
ergy development is unprecedented and therefore
brings. These industries also have key experience
is unfamiliar ground for the regulatory and policy
and expertise that the offshore wind sector needs
arenas. Regulatory bodies have been using the
to develop cost effectively and safely.
existing regulatory frameworks to permit proposed
offshore wind projects, but additional strategic
Encouraging the creation of a coherent
planning and resource management strategies are
offshore wind industry identity
needed to address the specifi c requirements of a
robust offshore wind energy development. Timely
The development of a coherent European offshore
involvement of the Transmission System Opera-
wind industry identity will require specifi c initiatives
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
17
to promote partnerships and to bring new actors
Research and
from other sectors into the market who have the
Technological Development
necessary skills and knowledge, for instance from
the offshore oil and gas industry. One potential in-
Current offshore wind energy system designs have
dustry initiative could be to develop a ‘supply chain
been adapted from onshore-based versions and de-
code of practice’. Such a model was brought for-
ployed in shallow waters for more than a decade. Off-
ward in the 1990s by the UK offshore oil and gas
shore wind energy technology is evolving toward larger-
sector. This would set out the conditions of busi-
scale and fully marinised offshore systems that can
ness in the sector, promote confi dence in the busi-
be deployed in a range of water depths across a wider
ness relationships and ensure fair profi ts for all.
range of geographical areas. Today, a number of large
wind turbine types primarily designed for offshore use
Creating comparable European training and
are available: several manufacturers have developed
qualifi cation standards to ensure suffi cient
turbines that range from 3 to 5 MW in capacity. Re-
workforce capacity and human resources, and
search is needed to enable a cost-effective large-scale
to increase cross border cooperation
deployment of the technology. As important as any of
these technical issues is fi nance, in particular how
New requirements with regard to employee qualifi -
easy it will be to raise the investment sums required
cations in the areas of project management, nation-
for the new larger offshore projects of 100 MW and
al and international law, quality assurance, occupa-
scheduled to be built over the next decade.
tional safety and health care and technical English
are evident in almost all sectors of the value-added
RECOMMENDATIONS:
chain. A detailed analysis19 of the European market
recently revealed defi cits which can be attributed
Establishing credible cost benchmarks and
to a lack of comparability and transferability of na-
targets for future offshore wind energy costs
tional professional qualifi cations, certifi cates and
standards.
The prime focus of all R&D efforts for offshore wind
should be to increase the cost-effectiveness of the
technology, without compromising on safety. For
19 Qualifi cation Requirement – Analysis Offshore Wind Energy Industry 2005
18
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
Lillgrund wind farm, Sweden
(© Hans Blomberg, Vattenfall)
growth areas in Europe today. Both top down and
bottom up approaches must be facilitated: top
down through better EU and national coordination
of research programmes, and bottom up through
better cooperation between various stakeholders
such as research institutes, universities, wind
industry, consultancy fi rms, and so on.
example, the industry could establish the current
The Strategic Energy Technology Plan that the
cost base for the technology in order to set bench-
European Commission is preparing should guide
marks for the various components of offshore wind
R&D efforts in the key areas, with a view to de-
projects, including the operation and maintenance
creasing the long term generation costs. The
phase. Once these have been determined, targets
European Wind Energy Technology Platform (TP-
for reducing these costs in the period up to 2020
Wind), which was launched in October 2006, must
can and should be formed. This will give policy-
become central in defi ning the key R&D priorities.
makers confi dence that the overall cost of devel-
The European Commission must take into ac-
oping the sector is known and will go down over
count the opinion of the sector representatives
time, in the long term converging with the costs of
through TPWind when it comes to formulating its
alternative power investments.
R&D priorities for offshore wind.
Increasing and prioritising offshore wind R&D
Increasing R&D cooperation between
calls at EU and national level: the role of the
industries and with public authorities
Strategic Energy Technology Plan20 and of the
European Wind Energy Technology Platform21
The European Wind Energy Technology Platform
enhances cooperation between the various stake-
Collaborative efforts and increasing targeted EU and
holders. An updated strategic research agenda and
national funds are crucial for advancing technology
market deployment strategy will include the long-
development that tailors offshore wind systems
term priorities regarding wind resource assessment
to the marine environment. It is vital that suitable
and forecasting, wind turbine optimisation, wind
resources are put into R&D and innovation at both
energy integration, offshore deployment and opera-
EU and Member State levels. Failure to provide
tions, wind and electricity market evolutions, policy
suffi cient support for R&D in wind energy would
recommendations, payment mechanisms and envi-
risk the loss of one of the key energy technology
ronmental impact assessment optimisation.
20 Towards a European Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET-Plan) Communication COM(2006)847 http://ec.europa.eu/energy/res/setplan/communication_en.htm
21 European Technology Platform for Wind Energy (TPWind) http://www.windplatform.eu
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
19
Burbo Bank wind farm, UK
(© Siemens AG)
Increasing cooperation between national
and European technology platforms
Several Member States have conducted com-
prehensive research programmes on offshore
wind. Some of them have set up technology plat-
forms22. The European Wind Energy Technology
Platform is the place for coordination of these
national initiatives.
This initiative could accelerate the pace of in-
novation and address the fragmentation of the
Conducting research studies and programmes
market and of R&D efforts across Europe, pri-
investigating the potential multiple use of the
vate and public, by means of a common and
sea at the same location through dedicated
compelling Strategic Research Agenda (SRA).
FP7 joint calls organised by the EU
One of the fi rst steps of this initiative could be
a pan-European test site with different turbines
Encouraging demonstration programmes of full-
funded partly by the EU and interested Member
scale projects, coastal onshore prototype test
States alongside companies.
sites and facilities suitable for accommodating
larger offshore prototype turbines
Grid Integration
Exploring new approaches
for accelerating innovation through:
There are currently no electrical grids present at sea
to connect large-scale offshore wind energy. In addi-
• The contribution of the European Institute of
tion to the absence of offshore grids, current onshore
Technology (proposed by the Commission)
transmission networks cannot accommodate some
could help to fi ll the gaps between education,
of the most ambitious plans for offshore wind farm
research and innovation
deployment. The necessary redesigns of the grid in-
frastructure, system management, grid regulation and
• A Joint Technology Initiative which could be of
grid codes must be made to refl ect the characteristics
great interest for securing long-term public-pri-
of renewable energy technologies. Increasingly, large
vate partnerships. The JTI for wind power could
offshore projects will be treated as “power plants” to
secure employment in Europe and reinforce the
be integrated in the same way as conventional power
European industry’s leading position in wind
stations. This will certainly necessitate both national
systems technology, thereby yielding both direct
and cross border network upgrades, raising the need
and indirect benefi ts to the European citizen.
for infrastructure investment.
22 Denmark: Megavind – http://www.windpower.org/megavind, Spain: Reoltec – http://www.reoltec.net
20
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
There is no doubt that transmission and distribution
Revising the guidelines for Trans-European
infrastructure will need to be extended and reinforced
Energy Networks according to the new
in most EU countries when large amounts of wind
commitments of the EU
power are connected. However, extensions and re-
inforcements are needed not only to accommodate
This should be done along the lines set out in the
wind power, but also to connect other power sources
Priority Interconnection Plan (COM(2006)846), and
necessary to meet the rapidly growing European elec-
it should support the energy policy targets agreed
tricity demand. The present grid system, however, is
by the European Council in March 2007. Future revi-
not yet used to its full extent and in an optimal way.
sions of TEN-E guidelines should take into account
results of dedicated studies at European level on
A proper defi nition of the interfaces between the wind
large-scale integration of wind power (TradeWind).
power plant itself (incl. the “internal” grid and the
corresponding electrical equipment) and the “exter-
Defi ning allocation of costs for grid
nal” grid infrastructure (i.e. new grid connection and
infrastructure mechanisms to ensure that all
extension/reinforcement of the existing grid) has to
players have a real incentive
be discussed, especially for remote wind farms and
offshore wind energy. This does not necessarily mean
Germany recently decided to put an obligation on
that the additional grid tariff components due to wind
the transmission grid operators to provide the off-
power connection and grid extension/reinforcement
shore HV network infrastructure for the connec-
have to be paid by the local/regional customers only.
tions to the wind farms. The UK is developing a
These costs could be socialised within a “grid infra-
regulated transmission for offshore that is in line
structure” component at national, or even EU level. Of
with the system that operates onshore. In general,
course, corresponding accounting rules would need to
grid expansions and reinforcements due to large
be established for the grid operators.
scale wind developments should be approached
and fi nanced by Transmission Systems Operators
RECOMMENDATIONS:
in the same way as upgrades following increases
in other forms of renewable electricity production
Cooperation between Member States and with
or conventional power supply, and on the basis of
grid-related stakeholders should be encouraged
long term integral system and grid planning.
and intensifi ed
Integrating future scenarios for offshore wind
One key opportunity to do so is through an effec-
power development into strategic grid planning
tive and quick involvement of the coordinator for
at national and EU level
offshore/onshore wind projects in Northern Eu-
rope, appointed in 2007 for the implementation of
EU grid operators should cooperate and develop
the most critical identifi ed priority projects.
common commercial and technical codes and se-
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
21
Egmond aan Zee, Netherlands
(© Shell WindEnergy)
Beyond technical and economic issues, the sustain-
ability of an offshore wind power industry will depend
on focusing on environmental compatibility and impact
mitigation as high design priorities, and on improv-
ing understanding of the interactions that will occur
curity standards, as well as plan and coordinate
between offshore wind development and marine eco-
the investments needed at EU level. This would
systems. Demonstrating the compatibility of offshore
also promote cross border trade, increase compe-
wind energy systems with ecological systems and hu-
tition in the EU internal energy market and create
man uses of the ocean will be required for offshore
a more level playing fi eld for operators. For any
wind energy development to proceed with the neces-
new initiatives, closer regulatory supervision is
sary public support. Knowledge of the intensity and
also necessary to guarantee price transparency,
scale of potential impacts on the local environment
network access and clear investment incentives.
remains limited. First results of multi-annual moni-
Strengthening EU coordination of regulators and
toring studies are however, promising. The results
increasing the powers of national regulators as the
of such studies should be widely promoted and the
European Commission proposed in 2007 should
knowledge gained should impact the level and quan-
be encouraged.
tity of information requested for developers in their
future applications. Generic research in cumulative ef-
fects and increased standardisation of environmental
Environment and Planning
impacts assessment should also be encouraged.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Even before wind farms are constructed there are a
considerable number of issues to be resolved over
EU Member States should strive for one single
site selection, including legal rights and coastal zon-
regulatory regime and legislative framework
ing. Up to the traditional 12 mile (22.2 km) distance
applicable to both territorial waters and the
from a particular country’s shore, approval for and ne-
Economic Exclusive Zone23
gotiation over offshore development rights rest with
the national authorities. Beyond this, although most
A stable and predictable policy framework is very
countries have declared a further area as an EEZ
important for a young industry, allowing it to ma-
(Economic Exclusive Zone), there is still some uncer-
ture. The sea knows no borders, and so the rules
tainty as to exactly what this jurisdiction covers. There
which are applied to allow projects to develop
is also a need to avoid developers claiming rights for
should be consistent wherever they are sited. Such
the exploitation of a particular sea area, but then not
consistency will promote the effi ciency of develop-
progressing with a project.
ment, and allow developers to predict with confi -
23 Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) is a seazone within which a state has special rights over the exploration and use of marine resources. Generally a state’s
EEZ extends to a distance of 200 nautical miles (370 km) out from its coast.
22
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
Bremerhaven wind farm, Germany
(© Multibrid)
dence whether a project can be developed in an
Expanding existing cooperation on
environmentally acceptable manner and in what
environmental research to more Member
timeframe.
States
Encouraging effi cient procedures which
Bilateral initiatives already exist and the Danish-
are based on past experiences and are in
German cooperation on research into the impacts
proportion to the scale and the impact of the
of offshore wind power in the marine environment
project
works successfully. Such cooperation could be rep-
licated or expanded; the possibilities of including
The body of knowledge on the impacts of offshore
other interested countries should be explored. The
wind on the marine environment is growing rap-
scope of the cooperation today, which includes envi-
idly. It is important that the knowledge generated
ronmental issues, could also be widened to include
in different countries is shared effi ciently so that
technologically-orientated aspects. Other projects
research is not duplicated, and so that best prac-
of regional cooperation are in preparation. There is
tices can be disseminated quickly. In particular,
one such project between the United Kingdom, the
evidence that establishes when precautionary ap-
Netherlands and Sweden, who plan to develop a
proaches can be abandoned needs to be circulat-
proposal for a workshop of Member States’ wind
ed rapidly so that developers are not burdened with
farm licensing authorities. This would allow them
unnecessarily onerous conditions before consent
to share examples of consenting procedures and
can be given.
to identify opportunities for streamlining, as well as
sharing examples for decision-making strategies
Encouraging the establishment and
under uncertain ecological baseline information.
implementation of marine spatial planning
The impacts of such initiatives should be fully inves-
instruments
tigated and good practices must be encouraged.
Suitable areas and locations for offshore wind pow-
Another approach has been the use of Strategic
er in the marine environment may compete with
Environmental Impact Assessments to consider
other uses of the sea such as nature conserva-
the likely environmental effects on sea areas be-
tion, fi sheries, sea transport, tourism and military
fore they are offered up for licensing to specifi c
interest. The use of marine planning instruments is
wind developers. This was the case, for instance,
needed to help resolve potential confl icts, to regu-
before the UK selected three large sea areas off
late the competing uses of the seas via a transpar-
its east and west coasts for up to 7,200 MW of
ent decision making process and to achieve opti-
wind capacity.
mal site selection.
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
23
Policy recommendations:
summary
Policy
• Establishing a European policy framework for offshore wind power
• Increasing regional cooperation to maximise the synergies and
complementarities of various regions with offshore wind ambition
around the North Sea, the Baltic sea, the Atlantic Ocean and the
Mediterranean
• Clarifying roles for regulation, governmental and European policies
Market
• Establishing stable, coordinated long-term markets for offshore
wind in Europe
• Building and optimising the supply chain for a timely and sustain-
able fl ow of commercial projects
• Establishing coordination and collaboration with the power in-
frastructure industry, the maritime industry and the oil and gas
industry in order to integrate offshore wind power with established
uses of the sea
• Encouraging the creation of a coherent offshore wind industry
identity
• Creating comparable European training and qualifi cation standards
to ensure suffi cient workforce capacity and human resources, and
to increase cross-border cooperation.
Research and Technological Development
• Establishing credible cost benchmarks and targets for future off-
shore wind energy costs
• Increasing and prioritising offshore wind R&D calls at EU and
national level
• Increasing R&D cooperation between industries and with public
authorities
• Increasing cooperation between national and European technology
platforms
24
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
Middelgrunden wind farm (© LM Glasfi ber)
• Conducting research studies and programmes investigating the
potential multiple uses of the sea at the same location through
dedicated FP7 joint calls organised by the EU
• Encouraging demonstration programmes of full-scale projects and
coastal onshore prototype test sites and facilities suitable for ac-
commodating larger offshore prototype turbines
• Exploring new approaches for accelerating innovation through the
contribution of the European Institute of Technology and/or a Joint
Technology Initiative
Grid Integration
• Cooperation between Member States and with grid related stake-
holders should be encouraged and intensifi ed
• Revising the guidelines for Trans-European Energy Networks, ac-
cording to the new commitments of the EU
• Defi ning allocation of costs for grid infrastructure mechanisms to
ensure that all players have a real incentive
• Integrating future scenarios for offshore wind power development
into strategic grid planning at national and EU level.
Environment and Planning
• EU Member States should strive for one single regulatory regime
and legislative framework applicable both to territorial waters and
the Economic Exclusive Zone.
• Encouraging effi cient planning procedures which are based on past
experiences and are in proportion to the scale and the impact of
the project
• Encouraging the establishment and implementation of marine spa-
tial planning instruments
• Expanding existing cooperation on environmental research to more
Member States
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
25
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank all those who contributed to drafting and producing
this report. In particular, besides the colleagues of the EWEA Secretariat, we
would like to gratefully acknowledge the following persons:
Carlos Gascó Travesedo, Iberdrola energias renovables
Claudia Grotz, German Wind Power Association / Bundesverband WindEnergie
Martin Huss, A2Sea
Jakob Lau Holst, Danish Wind Industry Association / Vindmølleindustrien
Raul Manzanas Ochagavia, Acciona Energia
Bo Mørup, Vestas Offshore A/S
Matthias Rapp, Swedish Wind Energy / Svensk Vindkraft
Jan van der Tempel, Delft University of Technology – Offshore engineering
Chris Veal, Airtricity
Principal Authors:
Gordon Edge, British Wind Energy Association, Chair of the OWIG group
Loïc Blanchard, Senior Policy Advisor, EWEA
26
DELIVERING OFFSHORE WIND POWER IN EUROPE
Middelgrunden wind farm, Denmark (© LM Glasfi ber)
About EWEA
EWEA is the voice of the wind industry – actively
promoting the utilisation of wind power in Eu-
rope and worldwide.
EWEA members from 40 countries represent
over 350 companies, associations and re-
search institutions. These members include
manufacturers covering 98% of the world wind
power market, component suppliers, research
institutes, contractors, national wind and renew-
ables associations, developers, electricity pro-
viders, fi nance and insurance companies and
consultants. This combined strength makes
EWEA the world’s largest and most powerful
wind energy network.
The EWEA Secretariat is located in Brussels at
the Renewable Energy House. The Secretariat
co-ordinates European policy, communications,
research, and analysis. It manages various Eu-
ropean projects, hosts events and supports the
needs of its members.
Tel: +32 2 546 1940 – Fax: +32 2 546 1944
E-mail: ewea@ewea.org – Web: www.ewea.org
Published by EWEA, December 2007
Printed on FSC certifi ed paper / Design & production by www.inextremis.be
